Although
first published several years ago, a particular story has dogged Mitt Romney’s
campaign for months during the 2012 Republican primary. The Dog Story. A quick synopsis (confirmed by multiple
members of the Romney family): while driving the family from Boston to Toronto
in 1985, Mitt thought it a good idea to affix a dog kennel to the roof of the car,
toss the dog, Seamus, inside, and take a road trip with the family. During the trip, several of his sons noticed
a brown liquid dripping down the side and proceeded to yell out, “gross,” as the
dog had shat in his temporary living quarters, which was now streaming down the
car (as any dog owner would know, dogs are quite susceptible to anxiety, they
hate being left alone, often get nervous during lightning storms), so hurtling
down the interstate at 65 miles per hours does wonders for their psyches and bowels.
When asked
about this story some years later, Mitt’s first attempt at an explanation
included, the kennel was air-tight so the dog was safe. Well, if the box was air tight, the dog would
have died and shit would not have been all over his car. In his second attempt at an explanation, Mitt
assured all of us that the dog loved it, it was no big deal, Seamus jumped
right in.
At first
glance, maybe this story can be dismissed as a mole hill, media hyperbole
elevating a story to circulate through a couple of news cycles. Just as the commercial media elevated no
less than eight candidates as the next Republican nominee (remember Michele
Bachmann and Herman Cain?) to fill their 24 hours of horse racing, Mitt’s dog
story might be just that. But those
folks came and went (as well as an infinite number of forgotten election controversies),
Seamus has not gone away.
And the
reason this anecdote has not vanished is because in many significant ways it demonstrates
the problem with the Romney campaign.
The guy is clueless, so detached from reality and so inept at human
connection that he thought it was a good idea to drive a car down the road with
a dog fastened to the roof. At its
simplest: this was a terrible idea, end of story. As president, don’t we want a leader that
makes good decisions?
Another
example of the detriment to and symbolism of this story on the Romney campaign,
the Republican echo chamber began a talking points campaign this week highlighting
an excerpt from President Obama’s first book, Dreams of My Father, and his story of being a nine-year old in
Indonesia that ate dog meat (as well as snake, grasshopper) served by his
stepfather. While hard to comprehend in
our culture where dogs are members of our family, in the Indonesian culture as
well as many others, eating dog is not uncommon.
Nevertheless,
in an interview with the National Review,
Mitt was asked this week the following question: In light of the President’s strange dietary selections in Indonesia,
what is the strangest food you’ve ever eaten? Mitt’s reply: I don’t recall eating anything particularly bizarre. In addition to this gem, Sarah Palin made a
joke about eating dog meat, Romney aide Eric Fehrnstrom commented on a photo of
the President with the White House dog as a “chilling photo,” and then comes
the best of the best, Daily Caller
genius Jim Treacher (the man taking credit for unearthing this bombshell from Obama’s
New York Times best seller first published
in 1995) who declared this week: Say what you want
about Romney, but at least he only put a dog on the roof of his car, not the
roof of his mouth. And whenever you bring up the one, we're going to bring up
the other.
So first
things first, Mitt’s reflection on his own dietary practices was one in a
thousand ways the President has been categorized as the Other. Mitt tells us that he has eaten escargot and
oysters and mussels but these are not “exceptional features of American
restaurants.” The ethnocentrism at the
root of his personal observation is another clear illustration of his
disconnect and narrow view of the world.
Now let us
get back to Treacher and his surrogacy here for Romney: the campaign wants the
dog story to go away, and yet, here it is in back in our faces, front and
center. And more moronically, Treacher compares
Mitt Romney’s decision-making and leadership to that of a nine-year-old boy. So the standards his supporters are holding him
to are the same as a child, a relatively poor child living with his family on
the other side of the world. Do not
forget, it was Romney that bound Seamus and the kennel to the roof of a car,
not a nine-year old boy.
I love the end of this piece. I want more people to appreciate your observations.
ReplyDelete